<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>povertyandhumanrights.org &#187; Commentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/category/publications/commentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:39:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Take The Welfare Time Limit Off the Books</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2004/07/take-the-welfare-time-limit-off-the-books/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2004/07/take-the-welfare-time-limit-off-the-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2004 19:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government of British Columbia now says that, over the next year, only 339 people will be affected by the 24-month time limit on welfare––the rule intended to limit “employable” welfare recipients to two-years of support during any five year period.
On Friday, the Government created a new exemption––the 25th. Now those who follow their employment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Government of British Columbia now says that, over the next year, only 339 people will be affected by the 24-month time limit on welfare––the rule intended to limit “employable” welfare recipients to two-years of support during any five year period.</p>
<p>On Friday, the Government created a new exemption––the 25th. Now those who follow their employment plans and are seeking work will be exempted from the 24-month time limit. Though this is an encouraging development, the Government still has to go the full course and remove the time limit from the books.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-198" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2004/07/take-the-welfare-time-limit-off-the-books/timelimitsopedreallyfinal/">Take The Welfare Time Limit Off the Books</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2004%2F07%2Ftake-the-welfare-time-limit-off-the-books%2F&amp;linkname=Take%20The%20Welfare%20Time%20Limit%20Off%20the%20Books"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2004/07/take-the-welfare-time-limit-off-the-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN singles out BC government on women&#8217;s rights (March 2003)</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/03/un-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/03/un-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2003 03:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social program cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[B.C. is not meeting its obligations to women under international human rights law. That
was the clear message of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of
Discrimination against Women in comments issued recently in New York City.
The U.N. Committee singled out the province of British Columbia for criticism in its
review of Canada’s compliance with the United [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">B.C. is not meeting its obligations to women under international human rights law. That</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">was the clear message of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Discrimination against Women in comments issued recently in New York City.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The U.N. Committee singled out the province of British Columbia for criticism in its</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">review of Canada’s compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Elimination</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). The Committee is concerned</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">about the disproportionately negative impact on women and girls of a number of recent</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">changes in British Columbia, including: funding cuts to legal aid and welfare assistance;</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">narrowed eligibility rules for welfare; the elimination of the freestanding Ministry of</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Women’s Equality; the abolition of the independent Human Rights Commission; the</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">closing of a number of courthouses; cuts in support programmes for victims of domestic</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">violence; and proposed changes regarding prosecution of domestic violence.</div>
<p>B.C. is not meeting its obligations to women under international human rights law. That was the clear message of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women in comments issued recently in New York City.</p>
<p>The U.N. Committee singled out the province of British Columbia for criticism in its review of Canada’s compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). The Committee is concerned about the disproportionately negative impact on women and girls of a number of recent changes in British Columbia, including: funding cuts to legal aid and welfare assistance; narrowed eligibility rules for welfare; the elimination of the freestanding Ministry of Women’s Equality; the abolition of the independent Human Rights Commission; the closing of a number of courthouses; cuts in support programmes for victims of domestic violence; and proposed changes regarding prosecution of domestic violence.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-195" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/03/un-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003/bccedawopedfinal/">UN Singles Out B.C. Government on Women’s Rights</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2003%2F03%2Fun-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003%2F&amp;linkname=UN%20singles%20out%20BC%20government%20on%20women%26%238217%3Bs%20rights%20%28March%202003%29"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/03/un-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Majority embraces stereotype of the poor (December 2002)</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/12/gosselin-court-split-december-2002/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/12/gosselin-court-split-december-2002/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 01:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gosselin v. A.G. Québec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Majority Embraces Stereotype of Poor
by Shelagh Day
The majority decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in last week’s welfare rights case,
Gosselin v Quebec, is a disturbing one. Five judges endorsed a Quebec scheme that
consigned thousands of 18 to 30 year old welfare recipients to extreme poverty, and
found that it did not harm the human dignity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Majority Embraces Stereotype of Poor</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">by Shelagh Day</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The majority decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in last week’s welfare rights case,</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Gosselin v Quebec, is a disturbing one. Five judges endorsed a Quebec scheme that</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">consigned thousands of 18 to 30 year old welfare recipients to extreme poverty, and</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">found that it did not harm the human dignity of these poor young people.</div>
<p>The majority decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in last week’s welfare rights case, <em>Gosselin v Quebec</em>, is a disturbing one. Five judges endorsed a Quebec scheme that consigned thousands of 18 to 30 year old welfare recipients to extreme poverty, and found that it did not harm the human dignity of these poor young people.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-190" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/12/gosselin-court-split-december-2002/gosselinopedsdfinalfinal-3/">Majority Embraces Stereotype of Poor</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2002%2F12%2Fgosselin-court-split-december-2002%2F&amp;linkname=Majority%20embraces%20stereotype%20of%20the%20poor%20%28December%202002%29"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/12/gosselin-court-split-december-2002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s in contempt over the Woodward&#8217;s squat? (November 2002)</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/11/whos-in-contempt-over-the-woodwards-squat-november-2002/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/11/whos-in-contempt-over-the-woodwards-squat-november-2002/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2002 01:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC Housing Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homelessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woodward's squat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the BC Housing Corporation dropped proceedings against
the 54 Woodwards squatters charged in October with contempt of court for occupying a
publicly-owned and vacant building. The Corporation seems to have realized that
continuing the contempt proceedings against the “Woodwards 54” would have increased
the public’s sympathy for the protesters, and further underlined the contempt that the
provincial government is guilty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">the BC Housing Corporation dropped proceedings against</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">the 54 Woodwards squatters charged in October with contempt of court for occupying a</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">publicly-owned and vacant building. The Corporation seems to have realized that</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">continuing the contempt proceedings against the “Woodwards 54” would have increased</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">the public’s sympathy for the protesters, and further underlined the contempt that the</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">provincial government is guilty of––its contempt for the rights of people who need</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">homes.</div>
<p>The BC Housing Corporation dropped proceedings against the 54 Woodwards squatters charged in October with contempt of court for occupying a publicly-owned and vacant building. The Corporation seems to have realized that continuing the contempt proceedings against the “Woodwards 54” would have increased the public’s sympathy for the protesters, and further underlined the contempt that the provincial government is guilty of––its contempt for the rights of people who need homes.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-162" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/11/whos-in-contempt-over-the-woodwards-squat-november-2002/housingopedfinal/">Who&#8217;s in Contempt Over the Woodward&#8217;s Squat? (Nov 2002)</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2002%2F11%2Fwhos-in-contempt-over-the-woodwards-squat-november-2002%2F&amp;linkname=Who%26%238217%3Bs%20in%20contempt%20over%20the%20Woodward%26%238217%3Bs%20squat%3F%20%28November%202002%29"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/11/whos-in-contempt-over-the-woodwards-squat-november-2002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed human rights legislation gets failing grade (September 2002)</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/09/proposed-human-rights-legislation-gets-failing-grade-september-2002/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/09/proposed-human-rights-legislation-gets-failing-grade-september-2002/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2002 00:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the second time in twenty years, the Government of British Columbia has decided to
abolish its Human Rights Commission. If the draft legislation set out in Bill 53 passes,
the Commission will be erased again, this time in the name of providing British
Columbians with a new, more efficient “direct access” model of human rights
enforcement.
For the second [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">For the second time in twenty years, the Government of British Columbia has decided to</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">abolish its Human Rights Commission. If the draft legislation set out in Bill 53 passes,</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">the Commission will be erased again, this time in the name of providing British</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Columbians with a new, more efficient “direct access” model of human rights</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">enforcement.</div>
<p>For the second time in twenty years, the Government of British Columbia has decided to abolish its Human Rights Commission. If the draft legislation set out in Bill 53 passes, the Commission will be erased again, this time in the name of providing British Columbians with a new, more efficient “direct access” model of human rights enforcement.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-147" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/09/proposed-human-rights-legislation-gets-failing-grade-september-2002/hropedsept02/">Proposed Human Rights Legislation Gets Failing Grade (Sept 2002)</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fproposed-human-rights-legislation-gets-failing-grade-september-2002%2F&amp;linkname=Proposed%20human%20rights%20legislation%20gets%20failing%20grade%20%28September%202002%29"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/09/proposed-human-rights-legislation-gets-failing-grade-september-2002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Human rights plunge into the past (April 2002)</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/04/human-rights-plunge-into-the-past-april-2002/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/04/human-rights-plunge-into-the-past-april-2002/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2002 00:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Human rights in British Columbia may be about to plunge backwards by twenty years. In
1983 Bill Bennett abolished the Human Rights Commission, fired all the Commissioners
and staff, and narrowed human rights legislation in one sweeping assault. Though a little
slower off the mark, the current government seems poised to substantially weaken the
province’s human rights institutions and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Human rights in British Columbia may be about to plunge backwards by twenty years. In</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">1983 Bill Bennett abolished the Human Rights Commission, fired all the Commissioners</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">and staff, and narrowed human rights legislation in one sweeping assault. Though a little</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">slower off the mark, the current government seems poised to substantially weaken the</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">province’s human rights institutions and protections.</div>
<p>Human rights in British Columbia may be about to plunge backwards by twenty years. In 1983 Bill Bennett abolished the Human Rights Commission, fired all the Commissioners and staff, and narrowed human rights legislation in one sweeping assault. Though a little slower off the mark, the current government seems poised to substantially weaken the province’s human rights institutions and protections.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-143" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/04/human-rights-plunge-into-the-past-april-2002/humanrightsopedfinalversion/">Human Rights Plunge into the Past</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2002%2F04%2Fhuman-rights-plunge-into-the-past-april-2002%2F&amp;linkname=Human%20rights%20plunge%20into%20the%20past%20%28April%202002%29"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/04/human-rights-plunge-into-the-past-april-2002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
