<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>povertyandhumanrights.org &#187; British Columbia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/tag/british-columbia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Nothing to report: Submission of the B.C. CEDAW Group</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2010/04/nothing-to-report-submission-of-the-b-c-cedaw-group/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2010/04/nothing-to-report-submission-of-the-b-c-cedaw-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 20:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Submissions to UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC CEDAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THE B.C. CEDAW GROUP IS A COALITION of women’s non-governmental and non-profit British Columbia organizations that are committed to advancing the equality interests of women and girls. THE B.C. CEDAW GROUP MADE SUBMISSIONS to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women at the time of its reviews of Canada in 2003 and 2008. THE B.C. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste">THE B.C. CEDAW GROUP IS A COALITION of women’s non-governmental and non-profit British Columbia organizations that are committed to advancing the equality interests of women and girls.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">THE B.C. CEDAW GROUP MADE SUBMISSIONS to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women at the time of its reviews of Canada in 2003 and 2008.</div>
<div>THE B.C. CEDAW GROUP ALSO MADE SUBMISSIONS to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in 2006, and participated in the preparation of the Canadian non-governmental report for the United Nations Human Rights Council’s Universal Peri-</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">odic Review of Canada in 2009.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">THE GOAL OF THE COALITION is to ensure that governments in British Columbia comply with their human rights obligations to women.</div>
<div><a href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/nothing-to-report.pdf">Nothing to Report</a></div>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2010%2F04%2Fnothing-to-report-submission-of-the-b-c-cedaw-group%2F&amp;linkname=Nothing%20to%20report%3A%20Submission%20of%20the%20B.C.%20CEDAW%20Group"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2010/04/nothing-to-report-submission-of-the-b-c-cedaw-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inaction and Non-compliance: British Columbia’s approach to Women’s Inequality</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2008/04/inaction-and-non-compliance-british-columbia%e2%80%99s-approach-to-women%e2%80%99s-inequality/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2008/04/inaction-and-non-compliance-british-columbia%e2%80%99s-approach-to-women%e2%80%99s-inequality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Submissions to UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC CEDAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's inequality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Submission of the B.C. CEDAW Group to the United nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women on the occasion of the Committee’s review of Canada’s 6th &#38; 7th reports. The B.C. CEDAW Group is a coalition of women’s non-governmental and non-profit British Columbia organizations that are committed to advancing the equality interests of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Submission of the B.C. CEDAW Group to the United nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women<br />
on the occasion of the Committee’s review of Canada’s 6th &amp; 7th reports.</p>
<p>The B.C. CEDAW Group is a coalition of women’s non-governmental and non-profit British Columbia organizations that are committed to advancing the equality interests of women and girls. The coalition first came together in 2002 to prepare a submission on the province of British Columbia to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, on the occasion of the Committee’s review of Canada’s fifth report under the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.</p>
<p>The B.C. CEDAW Group re-formed in 2008 to prepare this submission for the review of Canada’s Sixth and Seventh reports under the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.</p>
<p><a href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/CanadaBC2008final.pdf">Inaction and Inequality</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2008%2F04%2Finaction-and-non-compliance-british-columbia%25e2%2580%2599s-approach-to-women%25e2%2580%2599s-inequality%2F&amp;linkname=Inaction%20and%20Non-compliance%3A%20British%20Columbia%E2%80%99s%20approach%20to%20Women%E2%80%99s%20Inequality"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2008/04/inaction-and-non-compliance-british-columbia%e2%80%99s-approach-to-women%e2%80%99s-inequality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take The Welfare Time Limit Off the Books</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2004/07/take-the-welfare-time-limit-off-the-books/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2004/07/take-the-welfare-time-limit-off-the-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2004 19:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government of British Columbia now says that, over the next year, only 339 people will be affected by the 24-month time limit on welfare––the rule intended to limit “employable” welfare recipients to two-years of support during any five year period. On Friday, the Government created a new exemption––the 25th. Now those who follow their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Government of British Columbia now says that, over the next year, only 339 people will be affected by the 24-month time limit on welfare––the rule intended to limit “employable” welfare recipients to two-years of support during any five year period.</p>
<p>On Friday, the Government created a new exemption––the 25th. Now those who follow their employment plans and are seeking work will be exempted from the 24-month time limit. Though this is an encouraging development, the Government still has to go the full course and remove the time limit from the books.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-198" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2004/07/take-the-welfare-time-limit-off-the-books/timelimitsopedreallyfinal/">Take The Welfare Time Limit Off the Books</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2004%2F07%2Ftake-the-welfare-time-limit-off-the-books%2F&amp;linkname=Take%20The%20Welfare%20Time%20Limit%20Off%20the%20Books"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2004/07/take-the-welfare-time-limit-off-the-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter to the Prime Minister and BC Premier on welfare time limits</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2004/02/letter-to-the-prime-minister-paul-martin-and-premier-gordon-campbell-regarding-the-human-rights-obligations-of-federal-and-provincial-governments-with-respect-to-social-assistance-endorsed-by-137-org/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2004/02/letter-to-the-prime-minister-paul-martin-and-premier-gordon-campbell-regarding-the-human-rights-obligations-of-federal-and-provincial-governments-with-respect-to-social-assistance-endorsed-by-137-org/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2004 03:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Submissions to Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A letter written to Prime Minister Paul Martin and Premier Gordon Campbell, endorsed by 137 organizations, asking them to act immediately, together and separately, to ensure that legislation which imposes a twenty-four month time limit on eligibility for welfare in B.C. is rescinded before April 1, 2004, and that no similar provision is implemented in B.C. or any other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A letter written to Prime Minister Paul Martin and Premier Gordon Campbell, endorsed by 137 organizations, asking them to act immediately, together and separately, to ensure that legislation which imposes a twenty-four month time limit on eligibility for welfare in B.C. is rescinded before April 1, 2004, and that no similar provision is implemented in B.C. or any other province in future.</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">act immediately, together and separately, to ensure that</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">legislation which imposes a twenty-four month time limit on eligibility for welfare in</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">B.C. is rescinded before April 1, 2004, and that no similar provision is implemented in</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">B.C. or any other province in future.</div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-202" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2004/02/letter-to-the-prime-minister-paul-martin-and-premier-gordon-campbell-regarding-the-human-rights-obligations-of-federal-and-provincial-governments-with-respect-to-social-assistance-endorsed-by-137-org/timelimits_7_/">Letter to the Prime Minister Paul Martin and Premier Gordon Campbell  (February 2004)</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2004%2F02%2Fletter-to-the-prime-minister-paul-martin-and-premier-gordon-campbell-regarding-the-human-rights-obligations-of-federal-and-provincial-governments-with-respect-to-social-assistance-endorsed-by-137-org%2F&amp;linkname=Letter%20to%20the%20Prime%20Minister%20and%20BC%20Premier%20on%20welfare%20time%20limits"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2004/02/letter-to-the-prime-minister-paul-martin-and-premier-gordon-campbell-regarding-the-human-rights-obligations-of-federal-and-provincial-governments-with-respect-to-social-assistance-endorsed-by-137-org/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Right to Social Assistance: 14 Questions and Answers (October 2003)</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/10/the-right-to-social-assistance-14-questions-and-answers-october-2003/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/10/the-right-to-social-assistance-14-questions-and-answers-october-2003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2003 23:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Sheets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q & As]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social assistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[British Columbia is the only province in Canada to place a time limit on welfare eligibility. From diverse perspectives, many people are concerned about the harmful results of this harsh and unprecedented new rule. This report is a response to numerous requests that the Poverty and Human Rights Project has received from concerned groups and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">British Columbia is the only province in Canada to place a time limit on</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">welfare eligibility. From diverse perspectives, many people are concerned</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">about the harmful results of this harsh and unprecedented new rule. This</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">report is a response to numerous requests that the Poverty and Human Rights</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Project has received from concerned groups and individuals for an analysis</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">of the human rights implications of the 24 month cut off rule.</div>
<p>British Columbia is the only province in Canada to place a time limit on welfare eligibility. From diverse perspectives, many people are concerned about the harmful results of this harsh and unprecedented new rule. This report is a response to numerous requests that the Poverty and Human Rights Project has received from concerned groups and individuals for an analysis of the human rights implications of the 24 month cut off rule.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-135" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/10/the-right-to-social-assistance-14-questions-and-answers-october-2003/phrp/">The Right to Social Assistance: 14 Questions and Answers (October 2003)</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2003%2F10%2Fthe-right-to-social-assistance-14-questions-and-answers-october-2003%2F&amp;linkname=The%20Right%20to%20Social%20Assistance%3A%2014%20Questions%20and%20Answers%20%28October%202003%29"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/10/the-right-to-social-assistance-14-questions-and-answers-october-2003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moving Forward on Women&#8217;s Equality, Brief to the Standing Committee on Finance Pre-Budget Consultation (September 2003)</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/09/moving-forward-on-womens-equality-brief-to-the-standing-committee-on-finance-pre-budget-consultation-september-2003/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/09/moving-forward-on-womens-equality-brief-to-the-standing-committee-on-finance-pre-budget-consultation-september-2003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 03:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Submissions to Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic human rights law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The B.C. CEDAW Group submits that the federal government, when considering spending priorities, must take into account 1) the negative impact on women of recent cuts and changes to social programs and services made in the Province of British The B.C. CEDAW Group&#8217;s submission to the Standing Committee on Finance, outlining that the federal government, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The B.C. CEDAW Group submits that the federal government, when considering</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">spending priorities, must take into account 1) the negative impact on women of recent</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">cuts and changes to social programs and services made in the Province of British</div>
<p>The B.C. CEDAW Group&#8217;s submission to the Standing Committee on Finance, outlining that the federal government, when considering spending priorities, must take into account 1) the negative impact on women of recent cuts and changes to social programs and services made in the Province of British Columbia and 2) the domestic and international human rights law that guarantees equality to women in Canada.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-246" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/09/moving-forward-on-womens-equality-brief-to-the-standing-committee-on-finance-pre-budget-consultation-september-2003/bccedawgrouppre-budgetsubmission-2/">Moving Forward on Women&#8217;s Equality, Brief to the Standing Committee on Finance Pre-Budget Consultation (September 2003)</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2003%2F09%2Fmoving-forward-on-womens-equality-brief-to-the-standing-committee-on-finance-pre-budget-consultation-september-2003%2F&amp;linkname=Moving%20Forward%20on%20Women%26%238217%3Bs%20Equality%2C%20Brief%20to%20the%20Standing%20Committee%20on%20Finance%20Pre-Budget%20Consultation%20%28September%202003%29"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/09/moving-forward-on-womens-equality-brief-to-the-standing-committee-on-finance-pre-budget-consultation-september-2003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN singles out BC government on women&#8217;s rights (March 2003)</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/03/un-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/03/un-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2003 03:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social program cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[B.C. is not meeting its obligations to women under international human rights law. That was the clear message of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women in comments issued recently in New York City. The U.N. Committee singled out the province of British Columbia for criticism in its review of Canada’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">B.C. is not meeting its obligations to women under international human rights law. That</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">was the clear message of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Discrimination against Women in comments issued recently in New York City.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The U.N. Committee singled out the province of British Columbia for criticism in its</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">review of Canada’s compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Elimination</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). The Committee is concerned</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">about the disproportionately negative impact on women and girls of a number of recent</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">changes in British Columbia, including: funding cuts to legal aid and welfare assistance;</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">narrowed eligibility rules for welfare; the elimination of the freestanding Ministry of</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Women’s Equality; the abolition of the independent Human Rights Commission; the</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">closing of a number of courthouses; cuts in support programmes for victims of domestic</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">violence; and proposed changes regarding prosecution of domestic violence.</div>
<p>B.C. is not meeting its obligations to women under international human rights law. That was the clear message of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women in comments issued recently in New York City.</p>
<p>The U.N. Committee singled out the province of British Columbia for criticism in its review of Canada’s compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). The Committee is concerned about the disproportionately negative impact on women and girls of a number of recent changes in British Columbia, including: funding cuts to legal aid and welfare assistance; narrowed eligibility rules for welfare; the elimination of the freestanding Ministry of Women’s Equality; the abolition of the independent Human Rights Commission; the closing of a number of courthouses; cuts in support programmes for victims of domestic violence; and proposed changes regarding prosecution of domestic violence.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-195" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/03/un-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003/bccedawopedfinal/">UN Singles Out B.C. Government on Women’s Rights</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2003%2F03%2Fun-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003%2F&amp;linkname=UN%20singles%20out%20BC%20government%20on%20women%26%238217%3Bs%20rights%20%28March%202003%29"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/03/un-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>B.C. CEDAW Report: British Columbia Moves Backwards on Women&#8217;s Equality</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/01/b-c-cedaw-report-british-columbia-moves-backwards-on-women%ef%bf%bds-equality-prepared-by-the-poverty-and-human-rights-project-for-12-womens-and-anti-poverty-organizations-in-british-columbia-ja/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/01/b-c-cedaw-report-british-columbia-moves-backwards-on-women%ef%bf%bds-equality-prepared-by-the-poverty-and-human-rights-project-for-12-womens-and-anti-poverty-organizations-in-british-columbia-ja/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 04:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Submissions to UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[B.C. CEDAW Report: British Columbia Moves Backwards on Women&#8217;s Equality, prepared by the Poverty and Human Rights Project for 12 women&#8217;s and anti-poverty organizations in British Columbia, submitted to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on the occasion of the review of Canada&#8217;s 5th report on its compliance with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B.C. CEDAW Report: British Columbia Moves Backwards on Women&#8217;s Equality, prepared by the Poverty and Human Rights Project for 12 women&#8217;s and anti-poverty organizations in British Columbia, submitted to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on the occasion of the review of Canada&#8217;s 5th report on its compliance with the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-252" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/01/b-c-cedaw-report-british-columbia-moves-backwards-on-women%ef%bf%bds-equality-prepared-by-the-poverty-and-human-rights-project-for-12-womens-and-anti-poverty-organizations-in-british-columbia-ja/bccedawreport/">B.C. CEDAW Report: British Columbia Moves Backwards on Women&#8217;s Equality, prepared by the Poverty and Human Rights Project for 12 women&#8217;s and anti-poverty organizations in British Columbia (January 2003)</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2003%2F01%2Fb-c-cedaw-report-british-columbia-moves-backwards-on-women%25ef%25bf%25bds-equality-prepared-by-the-poverty-and-human-rights-project-for-12-womens-and-anti-poverty-organizations-in-british-columbia-ja%2F&amp;linkname=B.C.%20CEDAW%20Report%3A%20British%20Columbia%20Moves%20Backwards%20on%20Women%26%238217%3Bs%20Equality"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/01/b-c-cedaw-report-british-columbia-moves-backwards-on-women%ef%bf%bds-equality-prepared-by-the-poverty-and-human-rights-project-for-12-womens-and-anti-poverty-organizations-in-british-columbia-ja/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s in contempt over the Woodward&#8217;s squat? (November 2002)</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/11/whos-in-contempt-over-the-woodwards-squat-november-2002/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/11/whos-in-contempt-over-the-woodwards-squat-november-2002/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2002 01:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC Housing Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homelessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woodward's squat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the BC Housing Corporation dropped proceedings against the 54 Woodwards squatters charged in October with contempt of court for occupying a publicly-owned and vacant building. The Corporation seems to have realized that continuing the contempt proceedings against the “Woodwards 54” would have increased the public’s sympathy for the protesters, and further underlined the contempt that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">the BC Housing Corporation dropped proceedings against</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">the 54 Woodwards squatters charged in October with contempt of court for occupying a</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">publicly-owned and vacant building. The Corporation seems to have realized that</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">continuing the contempt proceedings against the “Woodwards 54” would have increased</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">the public’s sympathy for the protesters, and further underlined the contempt that the</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">provincial government is guilty of––its contempt for the rights of people who need</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">homes.</div>
<p>The BC Housing Corporation dropped proceedings against the 54 Woodwards squatters charged in October with contempt of court for occupying a publicly-owned and vacant building. The Corporation seems to have realized that continuing the contempt proceedings against the “Woodwards 54” would have increased the public’s sympathy for the protesters, and further underlined the contempt that the provincial government is guilty of––its contempt for the rights of people who need homes.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-162" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/11/whos-in-contempt-over-the-woodwards-squat-november-2002/housingopedfinal/">Who&#8217;s in Contempt Over the Woodward&#8217;s Squat? (Nov 2002)</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2002%2F11%2Fwhos-in-contempt-over-the-woodwards-squat-november-2002%2F&amp;linkname=Who%26%238217%3Bs%20in%20contempt%20over%20the%20Woodward%26%238217%3Bs%20squat%3F%20%28November%202002%29"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/11/whos-in-contempt-over-the-woodwards-squat-november-2002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed human rights legislation gets failing grade (September 2002)</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/09/proposed-human-rights-legislation-gets-failing-grade-september-2002/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/09/proposed-human-rights-legislation-gets-failing-grade-september-2002/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2002 00:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the second time in twenty years, the Government of British Columbia has decided to abolish its Human Rights Commission. If the draft legislation set out in Bill 53 passes, the Commission will be erased again, this time in the name of providing British Columbians with a new, more efficient “direct access” model of human [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">For the second time in twenty years, the Government of British Columbia has decided to</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">abolish its Human Rights Commission. If the draft legislation set out in Bill 53 passes,</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">the Commission will be erased again, this time in the name of providing British</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Columbians with a new, more efficient “direct access” model of human rights</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">enforcement.</div>
<p>For the second time in twenty years, the Government of British Columbia has decided to abolish its Human Rights Commission. If the draft legislation set out in Bill 53 passes, the Commission will be erased again, this time in the name of providing British Columbians with a new, more efficient “direct access” model of human rights enforcement.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-147" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/09/proposed-human-rights-legislation-gets-failing-grade-september-2002/hropedsept02/">Proposed Human Rights Legislation Gets Failing Grade (Sept 2002)</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fproposed-human-rights-legislation-gets-failing-grade-september-2002%2F&amp;linkname=Proposed%20human%20rights%20legislation%20gets%20failing%20grade%20%28September%202002%29"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/09/proposed-human-rights-legislation-gets-failing-grade-september-2002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

