<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>povertyandhumanrights.org &#187; women&#8217;s poverty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/tag/womens-poverty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 23:30:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Nothing to report: Submission of the B.C. CEDAW Group</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2010/04/nothing-to-report-submission-of-the-b-c-cedaw-group/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2010/04/nothing-to-report-submission-of-the-b-c-cedaw-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 20:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Submissions to UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC CEDAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THE B.C. CEDAW GROUP IS A COALITION of women’s non-governmental and non-profit British Columbia organizations that are committed to advancing the equality interests of women and girls. THE B.C. CEDAW GROUP MADE SUBMISSIONS to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women at the time of its reviews of Canada in 2003 and 2008. THE B.C. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste">THE B.C. CEDAW GROUP IS A COALITION of women’s non-governmental and non-profit British Columbia organizations that are committed to advancing the equality interests of women and girls.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">THE B.C. CEDAW GROUP MADE SUBMISSIONS to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women at the time of its reviews of Canada in 2003 and 2008.</div>
<div>THE B.C. CEDAW GROUP ALSO MADE SUBMISSIONS to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in 2006, and participated in the preparation of the Canadian non-governmental report for the United Nations Human Rights Council’s Universal Peri-</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">odic Review of Canada in 2009.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">THE GOAL OF THE COALITION is to ensure that governments in British Columbia comply with their human rights obligations to women.</div>
<div><a href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/nothing-to-report.pdf">Nothing to Report</a></div>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2010%2F04%2Fnothing-to-report-submission-of-the-b-c-cedaw-group%2F&amp;linkname=Nothing%20to%20report%3A%20Submission%20of%20the%20B.C.%20CEDAW%20Group"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2010/04/nothing-to-report-submission-of-the-b-c-cedaw-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moving Forward on Women&#8217;s Equality, Brief to the Standing Committee on Finance Pre-Budget Consultation (September 2003)</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/09/moving-forward-on-womens-equality-brief-to-the-standing-committee-on-finance-pre-budget-consultation-september-2003/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/09/moving-forward-on-womens-equality-brief-to-the-standing-committee-on-finance-pre-budget-consultation-september-2003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 03:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Submissions to Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic human rights law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The B.C. CEDAW Group submits that the federal government, when considering spending priorities, must take into account 1) the negative impact on women of recent cuts and changes to social programs and services made in the Province of British The B.C. CEDAW Group&#8217;s submission to the Standing Committee on Finance, outlining that the federal government, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The B.C. CEDAW Group submits that the federal government, when considering</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">spending priorities, must take into account 1) the negative impact on women of recent</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">cuts and changes to social programs and services made in the Province of British</div>
<p>The B.C. CEDAW Group&#8217;s submission to the Standing Committee on Finance, outlining that the federal government, when considering spending priorities, must take into account 1) the negative impact on women of recent cuts and changes to social programs and services made in the Province of British Columbia and 2) the domestic and international human rights law that guarantees equality to women in Canada.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-246" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/09/moving-forward-on-womens-equality-brief-to-the-standing-committee-on-finance-pre-budget-consultation-september-2003/bccedawgrouppre-budgetsubmission-2/">Moving Forward on Women&#8217;s Equality, Brief to the Standing Committee on Finance Pre-Budget Consultation (September 2003)</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2003%2F09%2Fmoving-forward-on-womens-equality-brief-to-the-standing-committee-on-finance-pre-budget-consultation-september-2003%2F&amp;linkname=Moving%20Forward%20on%20Women%26%238217%3Bs%20Equality%2C%20Brief%20to%20the%20Standing%20Committee%20on%20Finance%20Pre-Budget%20Consultation%20%28September%202003%29"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/09/moving-forward-on-womens-equality-brief-to-the-standing-committee-on-finance-pre-budget-consultation-september-2003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN singles out BC government on women&#8217;s rights (March 2003)</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/03/un-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/03/un-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2003 03:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social program cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[B.C. is not meeting its obligations to women under international human rights law. That was the clear message of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women in comments issued recently in New York City. The U.N. Committee singled out the province of British Columbia for criticism in its review of Canada’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">B.C. is not meeting its obligations to women under international human rights law. That</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">was the clear message of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Discrimination against Women in comments issued recently in New York City.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The U.N. Committee singled out the province of British Columbia for criticism in its</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">review of Canada’s compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Elimination</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). The Committee is concerned</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">about the disproportionately negative impact on women and girls of a number of recent</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">changes in British Columbia, including: funding cuts to legal aid and welfare assistance;</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">narrowed eligibility rules for welfare; the elimination of the freestanding Ministry of</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">Women’s Equality; the abolition of the independent Human Rights Commission; the</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">closing of a number of courthouses; cuts in support programmes for victims of domestic</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">violence; and proposed changes regarding prosecution of domestic violence.</div>
<p>B.C. is not meeting its obligations to women under international human rights law. That was the clear message of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women in comments issued recently in New York City.</p>
<p>The U.N. Committee singled out the province of British Columbia for criticism in its review of Canada’s compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). The Committee is concerned about the disproportionately negative impact on women and girls of a number of recent changes in British Columbia, including: funding cuts to legal aid and welfare assistance; narrowed eligibility rules for welfare; the elimination of the freestanding Ministry of Women’s Equality; the abolition of the independent Human Rights Commission; the closing of a number of courthouses; cuts in support programmes for victims of domestic violence; and proposed changes regarding prosecution of domestic violence.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-195" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/03/un-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003/bccedawopedfinal/">UN Singles Out B.C. Government on Women’s Rights</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2003%2F03%2Fun-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003%2F&amp;linkname=UN%20singles%20out%20BC%20government%20on%20women%26%238217%3Bs%20rights%20%28March%202003%29"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/03/un-singles-out-bc-government-on-womens-rights-march-2003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>B.C. CEDAW Report: British Columbia Moves Backwards on Women&#8217;s Equality</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/01/b-c-cedaw-report-british-columbia-moves-backwards-on-women%ef%bf%bds-equality-prepared-by-the-poverty-and-human-rights-project-for-12-womens-and-anti-poverty-organizations-in-british-columbia-ja/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/01/b-c-cedaw-report-british-columbia-moves-backwards-on-women%ef%bf%bds-equality-prepared-by-the-poverty-and-human-rights-project-for-12-womens-and-anti-poverty-organizations-in-british-columbia-ja/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 04:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Submissions to UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[B.C. CEDAW Report: British Columbia Moves Backwards on Women&#8217;s Equality, prepared by the Poverty and Human Rights Project for 12 women&#8217;s and anti-poverty organizations in British Columbia, submitted to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on the occasion of the review of Canada&#8217;s 5th report on its compliance with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B.C. CEDAW Report: British Columbia Moves Backwards on Women&#8217;s Equality, prepared by the Poverty and Human Rights Project for 12 women&#8217;s and anti-poverty organizations in British Columbia, submitted to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on the occasion of the review of Canada&#8217;s 5th report on its compliance with the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-252" href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/01/b-c-cedaw-report-british-columbia-moves-backwards-on-women%ef%bf%bds-equality-prepared-by-the-poverty-and-human-rights-project-for-12-womens-and-anti-poverty-organizations-in-british-columbia-ja/bccedawreport/">B.C. CEDAW Report: British Columbia Moves Backwards on Women&#8217;s Equality, prepared by the Poverty and Human Rights Project for 12 women&#8217;s and anti-poverty organizations in British Columbia (January 2003)</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2003%2F01%2Fb-c-cedaw-report-british-columbia-moves-backwards-on-women%25ef%25bf%25bds-equality-prepared-by-the-poverty-and-human-rights-project-for-12-womens-and-anti-poverty-organizations-in-british-columbia-ja%2F&amp;linkname=B.C.%20CEDAW%20Report%3A%20British%20Columbia%20Moves%20Backwards%20on%20Women%26%238217%3Bs%20Equality"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2003/01/b-c-cedaw-report-british-columbia-moves-backwards-on-women%ef%bf%bds-equality-prepared-by-the-poverty-and-human-rights-project-for-12-womens-and-anti-poverty-organizations-in-british-columbia-ja/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond the Social and Economic Rights Debate: Substantive Equality Speaks to Poverty (2002)</title>
		<link>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/08/beyond-the-social-and-economic-rights-debate-substantive-equality-speaks-to-poverty-2002/</link>
		<comments>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/08/beyond-the-social-and-economic-rights-debate-substantive-equality-speaks-to-poverty-2002/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2002 15:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phrc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles & Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An emerging issue in Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms1 jurisprudence is the defeat of poverty-related challenges based on their characterization as ‘social and economic’ rights claims. In a variety of cases, governments have argued, with some success in lower courts, that the Charter is a negative rights instrument—a document of civil and political rights rather than of social [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An emerging issue in Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms1 jurisprudence is the defeat of poverty-related challenges based on their characterization as ‘social and economic’ rights claims. In a variety of cases, governments have argued, with some success in lower courts, that the Charter is a negative rights instrument—a document of civil and political rights rather than of social and economic rights— which does not impose positive obligations on governments to assume a redistributive role. Tension about this issue is increasing as governments in Canada pursue cost-cutting agendas that diminish protections from poverty, and people are turning to the courts because they have no place else to go.</p>
<p><a href="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/11-day2020brodsky.pdf"> Beyond the Social and Economic Rights Debate: Substantive Equality Speaks to Poverty (2002)</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpovertyandhumanrights.org%2F2002%2F08%2Fbeyond-the-social-and-economic-rights-debate-substantive-equality-speaks-to-poverty-2002%2F&amp;linkname=Beyond%20the%20Social%20and%20Economic%20Rights%20Debate%3A%20Substantive%20Equality%20Speaks%20to%20Poverty%20%282002%29"><img src="http://povertyandhumanrights.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://povertyandhumanrights.org/2002/08/beyond-the-social-and-economic-rights-debate-substantive-equality-speaks-to-poverty-2002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

